ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Long term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) saw a significant increase in COVID-19 patients with prolonged acute illness recovery. Speech language pathologists (SLP) in LTACHs were integral in assessing swallowing and providing rehabilitation for dysphagia, however, there is limited research on LTACHs and dysphagia. Our aim was to describe this unique dysphagia management experience to improve future patient care. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted for patients admitted to RML Specialty Hospital for respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 from April 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021. Demographic information, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) reports with Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores and SLP notes were reviewed. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients presented with tracheostomy (93.9%) and were NPO (92.5%) on admission. A strong correlation (p = 0.029) was noted between dependence on mechanical ventilation and significant airway invasion, as indicated by PAS score of 7 or 8 on VFSS. There was a strong association (p = 0.001) between patients who had tracheostomy placed within 33 days of VFSS and recommendation for thin liquids. Upon discharge, the majority of patients (83.57%) transitioned successfully to oral diets, however, a strong association (p = 0.009) between higher age (≥ 62) and NPO at discharge was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Patients admitted post COVID-19 to LTACH, especially those requiring tracheostomy, demonstrated various degrees of dysphagia and benefited from SLP intervention and instrumental swallow assessments. Most patients admitted to LTACH for COVID-19 were successfully rehabilitated for dysphagia.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated masking in public spaces. Masks may impact the perceived attractiveness of individuals and hence, interpersonal relations. Objectives: To determine if facial coverings affect attractiveness. Methods: An online survey was conducted using 114 headshot images, 2 each-unmasked and masked-of 57 individuals. Two hundred and seven participants rated them on an ordinal scale from 1 (least attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed, as appropriate, for comparison. Results: For the first quartile, the average rating increased significantly when wearing a mask (5.89 ± 0.29 and 6.54 ± 0.67; P = 0.01). For control images ranked within the fourth quartile, the average rating decreased significantly when wearing a mask (7.60 ± 0.26 and 6.62 ± 0.55; P < 0.001). In the female subgroup (n = 34), there was a small increase in average rating when masked, whereas in the male subgroup (n = 23), there was a small decrease in average rating when masked, but the change was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). For unmasked female images ranked within the first quartile, the average rating increased significantly when wearing a mask (5.77 ± 0.27 and 6.76 ± 0.36; P = 0.001). For the female subgroup with mean ratings within the fourth quartile, the average decreased significantly when wearing a medical mask (7.53 ± 0.30 and 6.77 ± 0.53; P < 0.05). For unmasked male images ranked within the first quartile, the average rating increased when wearing a medical mask but the change was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), whereas for the control male images within the fourth quartile, the average rating decreased significantly when masked (7.72 ± 0.18 and 6.50 ± 0.54; P < 0.05). Conclusions: While wearing a facial covering significantly increased attractiveness for images less attractive at baseline, and decreased attractiveness for those that are more attractive at baseline; it did not cause a significant overall change in attractiveness in the study population.